On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4842924
DOI10.1093/biomet/82.2.287zbMath0823.62095OpenAlexW2057384784MaRDI QIDQ4842924
Eugene I. Litvak, Marcello Pagano, Xinming Tu
Publication date: 16 August 1995
Published in: Biometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/82.2.287
asymptotic efficiencymaximum likelihoodscreeninghuman immunodeficiency viruspooled testingestimate of prevalence
Related Items (40)
Applications of bulk queues to group testing models with incomplete identification ⋮ Statistical modeling for practical pooled testing during the COVID-19 pandemic ⋮ Tandem queues with impatient customers for blood screening procedures ⋮ Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing ⋮ Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group‐tested results with differential misclassification ⋮ On a couple of unresolved group testing conjectures ⋮ Interval estimation for messy observational data ⋮ Modeling sensitivity and specificity with a time-varying reference standard within a longitudinal setting ⋮ Robust group testing for multiple traits with misclassification ⋮ Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing ⋮ Sequential estimation in the group testing problem ⋮ Extensions of Dorfman’s Theory ⋮ On the construction of unbiased estimators for the group testing problem ⋮ Two‐Stage Hierarchical Group Testing for Multiple Infections with Application to the Infertility Prevention Project ⋮ Recycled incomplete identification procedures for blood screening ⋮ Determination of varying group sizes for pooling procedure ⋮ Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples ⋮ Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing ⋮ Analysis of Multistage Pooling Studies of Biological Specimens for Estimating Disease Incidence and Prevalence ⋮ Using Pooled Exposure Assessment to Improve Efficiency in Case‐Control Studies ⋮ Use of Binomial Group Testing in Tests of Hypotheses for Classification or Quantitative Covariables ⋮ Regression Models for Disease Prevalence with Diagnostic Tests on Pools of Serum Samples ⋮ A two-stage group testing model for infections with window periods ⋮ Statistical Inference Based on Pooled Data: A Moment-Based Estimating Equation Approach ⋮ Nonparametric deconvolution of density estimation based on observed sums ⋮ A queueing model for general group screening policies and dynamic item arrivals ⋮ Bias, efficiency, and agreement for group-testing regression models ⋮ Optimal group testing designs for prevalence estimation combining imperfect and gold standard assays ⋮ A New Estimator for a Population Proportion Using Group Testing ⋮ The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification ⋮ Comparing multiple sensitivities and specificities with different diagnostic criteria: applications to sexual abuse and sexual health research ⋮ Pool Screening: An Example of Independent Nonidentical Bernoulli Trial ⋮ Dual Estimation of Prevalence and Disease Incidence in Pool-Testing Strategy ⋮ Regression models for group testing: identifiability and asymptotics ⋮ Efficient methods for the estimation of the multinomial parameter for the two-trait group testing model ⋮ Multinomial group testing models with incomplete identification ⋮ Known Mean, Unknown Maxima? Testing the Maximum Knowing Only the Mean ⋮ Evaluation of a Frequentist Hierarchical Model to Estimate Prevalence When Sampling from a Large Geographic Area Using Pool Screening ⋮ Robust procedures for experimental design in group testing considering misclassification ⋮ Revisiting Nested Group Testing Procedures: New Results, Comparisons, and Robustness
This page was built for publication: On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
